Shield) hinein lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required rein the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met in forward facing CRSs with restraining https://www.saludcapital.gov.co/sitios/VigilanciaSaludPublica/Lists/Contactenos/DispForm.aspx?ID=756292